Today I have woken up and it is literal, they have called me of Basque Country Irratia, with the news about that the PP wants to modify the electoral Law in Basque Country to spend from 3 % to 5 % the minimum demanded to be able to have representation in the Basque Parliament.
The first thing, a small clarification on of what does the reform go. The idea is that that political education that obtains less than 5 % of the expressed valid votes is not born in mind at the time of the benches share-out. Namely that if a party extracts 4,55 % of the votes in Biscay, for example, that simply is ignored and the benches distribute between the rest.
The target, to make to disappear to the small parties of the Basque parliament.
The case is that the Spanish socialist party and the PP, they are taking a very bad custom as it is that of modifying the laws to eliminate all that that they is not favorable, they started with the left Basque nationalist and now they go for the parties of the mixed group and Aralar.
Farewell to the plurality.
Someone will be able to think that I write this post, because, theoretically, the first affected one would be EB.
In this respect two clarifications, the modification might not be applied by retroactive character, so up to the following elections there would be no affected one.
EB from 94 has overcome the barrier of 5 %, except in the last elections, and I have no reasons to think that it will not do it again in the following ones.
On the other hand, although the measurement was benefiting us, we would be opposite, because there is no sadder thing for the democracy that a parliament without minorities and without plurality.
If the topic goes forward, we will be able to do nothing to stop it, but that at least that the complaint remains clear.
P.D. I rectify, the PNV there is posicionado in against, so I withdraw the part in which he was speaking about the PNV. That serves to me as lesson not to pay attention to the journalistic informations without hearing the protagonists posicionarse.
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
López's plan
The previous one on the proposals of the Lehendakari of yesterday: I believe that they had to be presented in the Parliament, if it is something like his government program, I believe that the way of presenting it must not be a meeting species to the public positions of his government, but an appearance in the Parliament.
But good, to the margin of ésto and of the clear component of political marketing that had the act, there is a thing that worries me enough more, and it is the proposed sanitary reform.
I do not know it well, only I speak about the well-read thing and ear in the means, this is what the presentations have in public, but, evidently, the idea is to be in charge to house to the biggest number of chronic possible to liberate beds in the hospitals. The this way above mentioned, without much ado thought, it can looks like a reasonable idea, chronic light that they do not need treatment, why to have them in a hospital the whole day, but: who is going to attend to the chronic ones in his houses? Is the Lehendakari suggesting to be the families those who take charge of his care, when they have, for example, a crisis of something? If it is like that, of that time, it stops being reasonable to happen to be unacceptable.
In a welfare state as that it tries to be this one, it is not possible to move the responsibility of the administration to the families, we already know the experience with the dependent persons, let's not repeat the same operation with the chronic ones.
That the health is necessary to check it, in agreement, but without moving part of the problem, but looking for other formulae to solve it.
But good, to the margin of ésto and of the clear component of political marketing that had the act, there is a thing that worries me enough more, and it is the proposed sanitary reform.
I do not know it well, only I speak about the well-read thing and ear in the means, this is what the presentations have in public, but, evidently, the idea is to be in charge to house to the biggest number of chronic possible to liberate beds in the hospitals. The this way above mentioned, without much ado thought, it can looks like a reasonable idea, chronic light that they do not need treatment, why to have them in a hospital the whole day, but: who is going to attend to the chronic ones in his houses? Is the Lehendakari suggesting to be the families those who take charge of his care, when they have, for example, a crisis of something? If it is like that, of that time, it stops being reasonable to happen to be unacceptable.
In a welfare state as that it tries to be this one, it is not possible to move the responsibility of the administration to the families, we already know the experience with the dependent persons, let's not repeat the same operation with the chronic ones.
That the health is necessary to check it, in agreement, but without moving part of the problem, but looking for other formulae to solve it.
Saturday, March 20, 2010
In PNV in Biscay
Andoni Ortuzar was saying yesterday that or they obtain absolute majority in Biscay or that the roller SPANISH SOCIALIST PARTY - PP would evict them from the power. http://www.deia.com/2010/01/19/politica/euskadi/ortuzar-alerta-de-que-solo-una-mayoria-absoluta-evitara-que-el-rodillo-pse-pp-gobierne-bizkaia
It is legal that a party inhales to obtain the best possible electoral results, but to Mr. Ortuzar would be necessary to remind to him that more political education exists and that Basque Country does not limit itself to SPANISH SOCIALIST PARTY - PP on the one hand or PNV for other.
Onlooker the PNV that in the elections to personal details criticizes the bipartisanship, but to year and a half seen of the policewomen it has already begun trying to put it into practice.
But in addition to trying to minimize the value of the plurality, in this case of the society bizkaina, if we eliminate the element identitario: what differences do SPANISH SOCIALIST PARTY - PP and PNV have in the statutory ambience?
The delegations have basically three fat competitions, the tax system, the infrastructures and the social welfare.
If we bear in mind that PNV and Spanish socialist party have just signed an agreement in the ambience of the foralidad, that in the infrastructures PNV-PP - and Spanish socialist party they agree, except, at the moment, as for Urdaibai, and that, in this case, PP and PNV go to pine nut kernel at the time of raising doubts about the current public assistance model for the descent in the tax system, from a lefts point of view: what more does give the one who governs Biscay?
Because in the parliamentary ambience, it costs, there can be more aptitude to affect in the national - identitario, but: in the statutory one?
It is clear that the PNV only tries to support the power in Biscay and to José Luis Bilbao as Deputy general. Licit, but that do not begin us to feed scarecrows españolistas, when at the time of the truth, in Basque or in Spanish, they reckon to do exactly the same. Torrent Desperate Housewives S06E17 Chromolume #7 online
It is legal that a party inhales to obtain the best possible electoral results, but to Mr. Ortuzar would be necessary to remind to him that more political education exists and that Basque Country does not limit itself to SPANISH SOCIALIST PARTY - PP on the one hand or PNV for other.
Onlooker the PNV that in the elections to personal details criticizes the bipartisanship, but to year and a half seen of the policewomen it has already begun trying to put it into practice.
But in addition to trying to minimize the value of the plurality, in this case of the society bizkaina, if we eliminate the element identitario: what differences do SPANISH SOCIALIST PARTY - PP and PNV have in the statutory ambience?
The delegations have basically three fat competitions, the tax system, the infrastructures and the social welfare.
If we bear in mind that PNV and Spanish socialist party have just signed an agreement in the ambience of the foralidad, that in the infrastructures PNV-PP - and Spanish socialist party they agree, except, at the moment, as for Urdaibai, and that, in this case, PP and PNV go to pine nut kernel at the time of raising doubts about the current public assistance model for the descent in the tax system, from a lefts point of view: what more does give the one who governs Biscay?
Because in the parliamentary ambience, it costs, there can be more aptitude to affect in the national - identitario, but: in the statutory one?
It is clear that the PNV only tries to support the power in Biscay and to José Luis Bilbao as Deputy general. Licit, but that do not begin us to feed scarecrows españolistas, when at the time of the truth, in Basque or in Spanish, they reckon to do exactly the same. Torrent Desperate Housewives S06E17 Chromolume #7 online
Friday, March 19, 2010
The immigration, Vic, the Mail and the citizenship in gral.
I suppose, that who more who less knows the polemic that has been generated concerning the decision of Ayto. de Vic not to register the persons who could not credit his regular stay in Spain. I say it this way and do not speak of "without roles", because for me, the only ones that have lost here the roles are the leaders of Vic's town hall, well, and of Torrejón de Ardoz, and I am afraid, more that they will come.
Because they will come more, and will do it, because certain political parties with xenophobic, more or less disguised touches, have detected that the lynching of the immigrant can be a big electoral trick.
And there the problem takes root precisely, in the image that from certain political parties and mass media has happened of the immigration. Today, without going further, the Spanish Mail, http://www.elcorreodigital.com/vizcaya/20100122/vizcaya/robos-crecen-bilbao-20100122.html, was standing out, and even more if it fits in his edition in role, that 64 % of the arrested last year in Bilbao was of foreign origin. And I ask: What contributes this fact?
Badly the memory of the ayto. for the Mail reflects the fact and evil for meaning it, but worse all those that, today on having read the news, will have been reaffirmed it is his most xenophobic theses and they will have affirmed in the coffee, without any fill, that they were already saying it, "only they come to steal".
Of course, then when it is necessary to take care of elders, children, to serve glasses in bars and other works that nobody is ready to do for the misery that is paid to the immigrants, it is very good that they are somewhere here.
Now, that do not do a survey to us eh? that we all say that we are not xenophobic and that the doubt offends.
How much hypocrisy, gentleman, how much hypocrisy. Torrent Gossip Girl S03E14 The Lady Vanished now
Because they will come more, and will do it, because certain political parties with xenophobic, more or less disguised touches, have detected that the lynching of the immigrant can be a big electoral trick.
And there the problem takes root precisely, in the image that from certain political parties and mass media has happened of the immigration. Today, without going further, the Spanish Mail, http://www.elcorreodigital.com/vizcaya/20100122/vizcaya/robos-crecen-bilbao-20100122.html, was standing out, and even more if it fits in his edition in role, that 64 % of the arrested last year in Bilbao was of foreign origin. And I ask: What contributes this fact?
Badly the memory of the ayto. for the Mail reflects the fact and evil for meaning it, but worse all those that, today on having read the news, will have been reaffirmed it is his most xenophobic theses and they will have affirmed in the coffee, without any fill, that they were already saying it, "only they come to steal".
Of course, then when it is necessary to take care of elders, children, to serve glasses in bars and other works that nobody is ready to do for the misery that is paid to the immigrants, it is very good that they are somewhere here.
Now, that do not do a survey to us eh? that we all say that we are not xenophobic and that the doubt offends.
How much hypocrisy, gentleman, how much hypocrisy. Torrent Gossip Girl S03E14 The Lady Vanished now
THAT in Pasaia
Yesterday I was with a group of parents and mothers of Pasaia.
Xabier Pombo, our councilman in Pasaia, mentioned to me that it does a time that there was a group of parents and mothers claiming the construction of a public school of secondary in Pasaia, since in this moment his sons and daughters, as soon as the first cycle was finished, had to change center and attend to one in Donosti.
Beyond the claim, to all lights it jousts and reasonable, and that we will fight in the Parliament, I liked very much the possibility of being able to listen to a group of persons, joined concerning a request who understand is good for the people, independently of his political ideology in other ambiences.
In this country we put so many tags, which, sometimes, are made impossible to articulate a few minimal social or local movements, or what is worse, once articulated put the tags, and they end up by staying in nothing.
And I loved the fact that they were calling me and his requests were exhibiting me to be able to move them to the Parliament.
I have always said it and say it again now, the politicians, and more liberated as me, we would have to do a very special effort to leave our offices in the institutions, to meet different groups and to move to the Parliament the requests of different social groups, that, often they stay in nothing, simply because they do not meet anybody who could throw a hand to them in parties or trade unions.
Xabier Pombo, our councilman in Pasaia, mentioned to me that it does a time that there was a group of parents and mothers claiming the construction of a public school of secondary in Pasaia, since in this moment his sons and daughters, as soon as the first cycle was finished, had to change center and attend to one in Donosti.
Beyond the claim, to all lights it jousts and reasonable, and that we will fight in the Parliament, I liked very much the possibility of being able to listen to a group of persons, joined concerning a request who understand is good for the people, independently of his political ideology in other ambiences.
In this country we put so many tags, which, sometimes, are made impossible to articulate a few minimal social or local movements, or what is worse, once articulated put the tags, and they end up by staying in nothing.
And I loved the fact that they were calling me and his requests were exhibiting me to be able to move them to the Parliament.
I have always said it and say it again now, the politicians, and more liberated as me, we would have to do a very special effort to leave our offices in the institutions, to meet different groups and to move to the Parliament the requests of different social groups, that, often they stay in nothing, simply because they do not meet anybody who could throw a hand to them in parties or trade unions.
Thursday, March 18, 2010
The meeting
Last two or three weeks, we have been present in Basque Country at a mediatico-political spectacle, worthy of a soap opera.
We start a few weeks ago with the ditty if the Lehendakari and Urkullu had met and were speaking by phone or not.
Urkullu said that not, the Lehendakari about that not but that he was going to arrange it and from here on several holders were speculating with the date of a meeting between both.
In the end to the meeting date put itself, it is going to be Friday.
But skylight, it was necessary to warm the ambience, do not be going to be a meeting without much ado.
And to warm in the Spanish socialist party Jose Antonio Pastor is.
That if who directs the PNV, which if the hens and the eggs, anyway the whole series of verbal excesses opportunely answered by other big caldeador, in this case of the PNV, José Luis Bilbao.
The last trouble, the detention of a command of ETA to hands of the Ertzaintza. That if now the ertzaintza does and earlier not, that yes you do not say it to me in the street and I need an excuse, which pim that pam (as Jonan de Baraka would say).
The question logically is: what can be the target of all this rifi-rafe?
Since not any more not less that to impel López's leadership on the one hand and of Urkullu for other.
If the ambience is super warmly and both go out of the meeting moderating bagpipes and saying that now the relations between both parties are already well and that quite for the country, both are erected in level chiefs on the turpitude of others, not any more not less.
Because although, lately, it seems that the Spanish socialist party and the PNV go without speaking from March 1, it is necessary to remember that the PNV has approved the Shoemaker's budgets in Madrid, it has abstained in those of López, and that the Spanish socialist party in turn, it has abstained in the budgets of Together Personal details.
All this joined an agreement on tax system between PNV and Spanish socialist party.
Conclusion, a lot of noise and few nut, because at the time of the truth, when we speak of dineros, both defend the same, but it seems ugly to them to confess it.
We start a few weeks ago with the ditty if the Lehendakari and Urkullu had met and were speaking by phone or not.
Urkullu said that not, the Lehendakari about that not but that he was going to arrange it and from here on several holders were speculating with the date of a meeting between both.
In the end to the meeting date put itself, it is going to be Friday.
But skylight, it was necessary to warm the ambience, do not be going to be a meeting without much ado.
And to warm in the Spanish socialist party Jose Antonio Pastor is.
That if who directs the PNV, which if the hens and the eggs, anyway the whole series of verbal excesses opportunely answered by other big caldeador, in this case of the PNV, José Luis Bilbao.
The last trouble, the detention of a command of ETA to hands of the Ertzaintza. That if now the ertzaintza does and earlier not, that yes you do not say it to me in the street and I need an excuse, which pim that pam (as Jonan de Baraka would say).
The question logically is: what can be the target of all this rifi-rafe?
Since not any more not less that to impel López's leadership on the one hand and of Urkullu for other.
If the ambience is super warmly and both go out of the meeting moderating bagpipes and saying that now the relations between both parties are already well and that quite for the country, both are erected in level chiefs on the turpitude of others, not any more not less.
Because although, lately, it seems that the Spanish socialist party and the PNV go without speaking from March 1, it is necessary to remember that the PNV has approved the Shoemaker's budgets in Madrid, it has abstained in those of López, and that the Spanish socialist party in turn, it has abstained in the budgets of Together Personal details.
All this joined an agreement on tax system between PNV and Spanish socialist party.
Conclusion, a lot of noise and few nut, because at the time of the truth, when we speak of dineros, both defend the same, but it seems ugly to them to confess it.
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
The more and more distant retirement age
Before yesterday, we were surprising Shoemaker with the filtration to the mass media of his last occurrence, to delay the obligatory retirement age at the age of 67. All this properly accompanied by the publication on the part of the INE of a few demographic forecasts that announce that in 40 years, not any more nor less, the public pensions system is not going to be able to be supported.
Yesterday, since it could not be otherwise, the Cabinet gave him the ok to the measurement and the Vice-president of the Vega appeared before the mass media to say that they were going to look for the consensus, how, on the other hand, Shoemaker always does the government.
Several things, first, the forms. Shoemaker has the bad habit of approving something first and of asking for consensus later. How does it go to agree on anything that is already approved in the Cabinet? Why has not the debate moved first to the Agreement of Toledo, the trade unions, especially the trade unions, and later the measurements have been approved in the Cabinet? Less evil that this man does not have absolute majority, what would belong to us if it did not have to compromise with anybody in the Congress.
Second, the measurement in strict sense. First of all I have my very serious doubts of the forecasts to 40 years seen: who could imagine 40 years ago that Spain would be today how is life? Why is the only solution that the Spanish socialist party raises that of delaying the retirement age? Does no more imaginative proposal fit?
And third: how is it possible to announce the delay of the retirement age when there are more than 4 millions of stopped? Would not it be better to adopt measurements of effective stimulus to generate employment instead of delaying the retirement ages of those who work already? Does not realize this man that if the biggest workpeople do not stop working, the young people will ever be able to begin?
Yesterday, since it could not be otherwise, the Cabinet gave him the ok to the measurement and the Vice-president of the Vega appeared before the mass media to say that they were going to look for the consensus, how, on the other hand, Shoemaker always does the government.
Several things, first, the forms. Shoemaker has the bad habit of approving something first and of asking for consensus later. How does it go to agree on anything that is already approved in the Cabinet? Why has not the debate moved first to the Agreement of Toledo, the trade unions, especially the trade unions, and later the measurements have been approved in the Cabinet? Less evil that this man does not have absolute majority, what would belong to us if it did not have to compromise with anybody in the Congress.
Second, the measurement in strict sense. First of all I have my very serious doubts of the forecasts to 40 years seen: who could imagine 40 years ago that Spain would be today how is life? Why is the only solution that the Spanish socialist party raises that of delaying the retirement age? Does no more imaginative proposal fit?
And third: how is it possible to announce the delay of the retirement age when there are more than 4 millions of stopped? Would not it be better to adopt measurements of effective stimulus to generate employment instead of delaying the retirement ages of those who work already? Does not realize this man that if the biggest workpeople do not stop working, the young people will ever be able to begin?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
