The meeting

Last two or three weeks, we have been present in Basque Country at a mediatico-political spectacle, worthy of a soap opera.
We start a few weeks ago with the ditty if the Lehendakari and Urkullu had met and were speaking by phone or not.
Urkullu said that not, the Lehendakari about that not but that he was going to arrange it and from here on several holders were speculating with the date of a meeting between both.
In the end to the meeting date put itself, it is going to be Friday.
But skylight, it was necessary to warm the ambience, do not be going to be a meeting without much ado.
And to warm in the Spanish socialist party Jose Antonio Pastor is.
That if who directs the PNV, which if the hens and the eggs, anyway the whole series of verbal excesses opportunely answered by other big caldeador, in this case of the PNV, José Luis Bilbao.
The last trouble, the detention of a command of ETA to hands of the Ertzaintza. That if now the ertzaintza does and earlier not, that yes you do not say it to me in the street and I need an excuse, which pim that pam (as Jonan de Baraka would say).
The question logically is: what can be the target of all this rifi-rafe?
Since not any more not less that to impel López's leadership on the one hand and of Urkullu for other.
If the ambience is super warmly and both go out of the meeting moderating bagpipes and saying that now the relations between both parties are already well and that quite for the country, both are erected in level chiefs on the turpitude of others, not any more not less.
Because although, lately, it seems that the Spanish socialist party and the PNV go without speaking from March 1, it is necessary to remember that the PNV has approved the Shoemaker's budgets in Madrid, it has abstained in those of López, and that the Spanish socialist party in turn, it has abstained in the budgets of Together Personal details.
All this joined an agreement on tax system between PNV and Spanish socialist party.
Conclusion, a lot of noise and few nut, because at the time of the truth, when we speak of dineros, both defend the same, but it seems ugly to them to confess it.