The conclusions of the debate of the Left Basque nationalist

I did not want to begin to value the document of the IA yesterday, because it was the moment from the declarations to the means and the initial reaction, always less reflective than if you take a pair of days to turn and to read several times thoroughly the document.
In this case, nevertheless, the initial conclusions and the finals come to be the same.
The debate seems sincere to me, I do not agree with those who think that everything is a paripé to deceive the parties Law, I am sure that the majority of men and women of the IA is against of the violence of ETA (another thing is that they dare to say it) in fact, in the document one speaks of analyzing the wise moves and the errors of the past and especially, one speaks about the need of which it is the IA must adopt the decisions of a unilateral way (another thing is that they do it).
He speaks about suffering and speaks about the absence of interferences, injustices and violence so that the "democratic process" could advance and, finally, it leaves the thesis of the negotiation IA-Estado, in the political thing, to raise a table of political parties where the decisive agreement is achieved.
But even there, the rest, more neither of the same, nor only one mention to ETA but yes to the imposition and injustice of the Spanish and French states.
Euskal Herria insists on the territoriality of hego, ignoring the will of the citizenship Navarre, and once again it gets into debt in being located in the center of the political debate, as if we all were hoping that they should indicate us which it must be the way to be continued.
On the other hand, also it disappoints, the almost nonexistent reference to the economic situation through that we live, who says, to want to bet for the socialism, he should not ignore what is happening to his country, independently how it is articulated administratively.
I believe that the IA is not yet mature to pass of ETA desmarcarse, what it invalidates to them like speaker in any "decisive process", and ETA is not ready to disappear.
So once again we are in the same point, that one in which the political IA, much to his sorrow, keeps on being a hostage of the decisions of a military dome to which it does not matter already for him not why it fights, but only the struggle in itself.